We need to pay more attention to grammar and to teaching grammar — our means of making intelligible and communicating our thoughts — especially in this day and age when it is attacked and corrupted, and when we could be inadvertently “conditioned” by the bad grammar all around us. We could easily fall prey to some anti-grammar influences via cultural or “sense of life” factors, if we are not careful and aware. Heck, look around us: movies; modern music lyrics; politicians; newspapers. I’ve seen some pretty bad examples of writing from high school principals and teachers.
Some college professors and PhDs won’t help; that is, we cannot go to them for correction — they are the ones corrupting language, as those PhDs and professors in the NCTE do. It seems like the anti-literacy/anti-grammar crowd have control of the NCTE, and by implication primary/secondary schools, colleges, and teacher’s colleges.
I feel sorry for the teachers in school who need to keep their jobs, but are pressured into following modern anti-thinking, anti-reasoning methods of teaching language. Or for the teachers who try to fight for the sanctity of good grammar, but are censured or ostracized or attacked and vilified for their stance. Or the teachers who support good grammar but who leave the profession to get away from the anti-literacy crowd.
The corrupting influence goes into our schools and colleges, and students suffer for it. (We did, too, I’d think.) Instead of using instructional time wisely, instead of properly training students in spelling and grammar, students are subject to things like this, which the National Council of Teachers of English (NCTE) praises in one of their idealistic educational “vignettes”:
Each group prepares a presentation for the whole class, and these include a family dinner with dramatized flashbacks, a reconstructed television newscast, and a reenactment of a trip to a 1950s drive-in, complete with a cardboard Chevy and movie screen. (p. 42, Standards for the English Language Arts, by the International Reading Association (IRA) and the National Council of Teachers of English (NCTE), (c) 1996.)
Instead of reading and writing, students are cutting out cardboard cars and playing make-believe. And this was a high school “vignette”!!! A good education would be like that I heard about in an anecdote: someone I know had a friend who went to school in Europe. The person in Europe, in high school, had to write a five-paragraph paper every day in class. The teacher would have the papers graded and returned the next day. The person learned how to churn out good writing like it was nothing, like it was automatic.
The contempt for the written language– for true literacy — can be seen in one of the NCTE’s descriptions of literacy:
Being literate in contemporary society means being active, critical, and creative users not only of print and spoken language but also of the visual language of film and television, commercial and political advertising, photography, and more. Teaching students how to interpret and create visual texts such as illustrations, charts, graphs, electronic displays, photographs, film, and video is another essential component of the English language arts curriculum. Visual communication is part of the fabric of contemporary life. Although many parents and teachers worry that television, film, and video have displaced reading and encouraged students to be passive, unreflective, and uninvolved, we cannot erase visual texts from modern life even if we want to. (p. 5, the Standards.)
(more…)